Now showing: Nicaragua - Postage stamps (1940 - 1949) - 583 stamps.
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
29. August WM: None Design: Os selos da série 1005/1015 são tête-bêches, deveria constar? Engraving: Waterlow & Sons limited, Londres Perforation: 12½
